Petitioner withdrew a contempt petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for impugned order under Rule 121 of Delhi School Education Rules, 1973. Court disposed of petition accordingly while leaving contentions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
SATYA CHHIKARA ..... Petitioner
Through Col. Chhikara, authorised representative of petitioner in person.
versus
S KEMPARAJ & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms.Asha Jain Madan, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 18.10.2016
Since the order under Rule 121 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 is available at page 288 of the appeal paper book being LPA No.750/2013, authorised representative of the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid liberty, present contempt petition and application are disposed of. Rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
MANMOHAN, J
OCTOBER 18, 2016 KA
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satya Chhikara
S Kemparaj
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
