The High Court of Delhi heard a contempt petition where the petitioner sought to withdraw it with liberty to file execution proceedings. The petition and applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
petition and applications dismissed with liberty to file execution proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
ADISHWAR KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra with Mr. Anand Singh and Ms. Nishtha Khurana, Advs.
versus
RAJESHWAR JAIN & ORS ..... Respondents Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 03.10.2016
Attention of learned counsel for the petitioner has been drawn to a judgment of the Supreme Court in Kanwar Singh Saini. Vs. High Court of Delhi, (2012) 4 SCC 307 and a judgment of this Court in Jamna Datwani Vs. Kishin Datwani & Ors., Cont. Cas (C) 652/2014, decided on 24th September, 2014.
In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present contempt petition and applications with liberty to file execution proceedings.
With the aforesaid liberty, the present contempt petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn. Rights and contentions of all parties are left open.
MANMOHAN, J
OCTOBER 03, 2016/NG
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kanwar Singh Saini Vs. High Court of DelhiReferred¶9
Kanwar Singh Saini. Vs. High Court of Delhi, (2012) 4 SCC 307 · Who else cites this
Jamna Datwani Vs. Kishin Datwani & Ors.Referred¶9
Jamna Datwani Vs. Kishin Datwani & Ors., Cont. Cas (C) 652/2014
ADISHWAR KUMAR JAIN
RAJESHWAR JAIN
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
