The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a PIL on the same cause of action. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, leaving all rights and contentions open.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file PIL on same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
MADAN VAID THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SH. ASHOK KHANNA ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Amita Gupta, Advocate.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR
..... Respondents Through Mr.Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 03.10.2016
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a Public Interest Litigation on the same cause of action.
With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition and the applications are dismissed as withdrawn. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
MANMOHAN, J
OCTOBER 03, 2016 KA
MADAN VAID THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SH. ASHOK KHANNA
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
