Justice Manmohan disposed of a contempt petition as satisfied because the petitioner's representation was disposed of via an order dated 10th November, 2016. The petitioner has liberty to challenge that order.
Contempt petition disposed of as satisfied; liberty to challenge office order dated 10th November, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
#12
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEELAM ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ashok Aggarwal with Mr. Shoaib Akhta, Advocates
versus
KEWAL KUMAR SHARMA & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC (Civil) with Mr. Deboshree Mukherjee and Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Mukesh Chand from DoE in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 11.11.2016
Today in Court, learned counsel for respondents has handed over a copy of the order dated 10th November, 2016 by virtue of which petitioner’s representation has been disposed of. The same is taken on record.
In view thereof, present contempt petition is disposed of as satisfied. However, petitioner is given liberty to challenge the office order dated 10th November, 2016 in accordance with law.
Rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
MANMOHAN, J
NOVEMBER 11, 2016 rn
Neelam
Kewal Kumar Sharma
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
