Disposed

Dr. Bindu Rana v. Jai Radha Raman Education Society & Ors.

Delhi HC8 Jul 2016ARB.P./69/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Series of arbitration petitions and caveats before the High Court of Delhi. Proceedings involved notice acceptance, exemption from document filing, appointment of second arbitrator, and scheduling hearings, listing maintainability as an issue.

What did the court decide?

Directing parties to file replies/rejoinders and noting maintainability issue before listing for hearing.

Dr. Bindu Rana Vs Jai Radha Raman Education Society & Ors. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

Page 1 of 1

¶2

HIGH COURT OF DELHI

¶3

vSubjectl :22012 - ' ' ARB. PETITION U/S 11 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION i ACT 1996

¶4

SubjectZ :0 - " NOT ENTERED

¶5

DIARY 25015/2016 CASE ARB. P. Ir Filing28/01/16 NO : TYPE: Date :10:52:58

¶6

NO :

¶7

DR. BINDU RANA Vs.

¶8

JAI RADHA RAMAN EDUCATION SOCIETY & ORS.

¶9

The case has been passed for date : 29-JAN-16 The petition/appeal being in order,may be registered.

¶10

-w
<br>

¶11

SCRU ASSISTANT: SH.SUNIL DUTT

¶12

¶13

AOJ/AR(
<br>

¶14

Signature
Dealing Assistant
D

¶15

hUp://10.25.196.159/html/prashant/efiledefect.php?dno^250]5&dyr=2016 28-01-2016

Pase 1 of 1

:-Filing

Advocate Remarks Log

Advocate Remarks : 28/01/2016 10:52 AM All objections have been removed, and case may be listed before Hon'ble Court on 29/01/2016 and OMP (1) Comm No.71/2015 of the same parties already listed before HMJ V. Kameshwar Rao on 29/01/2016. 27/01/2016 12:39 PM -: Obj. (1) Exemption application already moved for dim/handwritten annexures. Obj. (2) , 4, 5 & 6 removed. Obj. 3 caveator for respondent No.2 has been served by hand and R- 1 & R-3 are private parties hence service not required. All objections have been removed and case may be listed before Hon'ble Court on 29/01/2016 and OMP (I) Comm No.71/2015 of the same parties already listed before HMJ V. Kameshwar Rao on 29/01/2016. The files will be digitally signed by me in person after obtaining the digital signature.

¶21

http://10.25.196.40;8080/eFiling/FetchAdvRemarksLog.do?diaryNo=25015&diary_Y... 28-01-2016

¶22

$-51 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 69/2016, CAV 78/2016 & lA 1371/2016

¶23

DR. BINDURANA

¶24

Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhijeet Sinha,Adv. with Mr. ArijitMazumdar,Ms.Titash Sen, Mr. AdityaShukla& Mr. Shambhu Nandy, Advs. versus

¶25

JAIRADHA RAMAN EDUCATION SOCIETY & ORS.

¶26

Respondent Through; Mr. SuhailDutt, Sr. Adv withMr. Niraj Kumar,Mr. A.S. Gyani,Mr. Vikram Shah, Advs. for R-1 & 3 Mr. Abhinav Vasisth, Sr. Adv with Mr. H.S. Chandhoke & Mr. Prashant Mishra, Advs for R-2

¶27

CORAM:

¶28

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER

¶29

% 29.01.2016

¶30

CAV 78/2016

¶31

Learned counsel for the caveator has put in appearance.

¶32

Caveat stands discharged.

¶33

lA 1371/2016( filed bv plaintiffseekingexemptionfrom filingoriginal documentsand typed and marginated copiesof the dim document)

¶34

Exemptionallowedsubjectto all just exceptions.

¶35

Applicationstandsdisposedof.

¶36

ARB.P. 69/2016

¶37

Notice. Mr. Niraj Kumar, Adv. accepts notice for respondentNos. 1

¶38

&3 and Mr. PrashantMishra,Adv. acceptsnoticefor respondentNo.2.

¶39

Let reply be filed within three weeks from today.' Rejoinderthereto,

¶40

be filed within one week thereafter.

¶41

Renotifyon 23"^ March, 2016.

ilW. V.KAME^ARRAO,J

JANUARY 29,2016/ak

$~1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 69/2016 DR. BINDURANA Petitioner Through: Mr. AbhijeetSinha,Adv. with Mr. Arijit Majumdar,Mr. Shambu Nandy, Mr. SiddharthNaidu, Ms. Titash Sen, Mr. Aditya Shukla, Advs.

¶46

versus

¶47

JAIRADHA RAMAN EDUCATION SOCIETY & ORS. Respondents Through: Dr. AbhishekM.Singhvi,Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhinav Vasisth, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prashant Mishra, Mr. Piyush Prasad, Ms. Neelu Mohan, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Niraj Kumar, Mr. Achint Singh Gyani, Mr. Vikram Shah, Advs. for R-3.

¶48

CORAM;

¶49

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER % 23.03.2016

¶50

Pleadings are complete. Reply has been filed by respondent No. 2 and rejoinder to the same has also been filed by the petitioner.

¶51

Learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No. 3 states that he would file reply within three weeks. Rejoinder be filed within two weeks thereafter.

¶52

Renotifyon 04^ May, 2016.

¶53

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶54

MARCH 23,2016/radhika

¶55

DR. HINDURANA

¶56

Through:Mr.AbhijeetSinha,Mr.ArijitMajumdar Mr.SindhuSiniha,Ms.TitashSen, Mr.Aditya Mr.S.Nandy,Advs.

¶57

versus

¶58

JAIRADHARAMANEDUCATIONSOCIETY&ORS.

¶59

, Respondents Though:Mr.SuhailDutt, Sr. Adv. with JVE.Achiht Singh,Mr.VikramShah, Advs. for R-3. Mr.AbhinavVaishisht,Sr.Adv.with Mr.Prashant Mishra,Mr.PiyushPramod,Ms.JomolJoy, Advs forR-2.

¶60

CORAM:

¶61

HON'BLEMR. JUSTICEV. KAMESWARRAO

¶62

ORDER 04.05.2016 Mr.SuhailDutt, learnedsenior counsel appearingfor respondentno.3 statesthat respondentno.3 is agreeablefor appointmentofJusticeDilipRao Deshmukh,as a secondArbitrator.

¶63

Mr.Abhinav Vashisht, learned senior counsel appearing for respondentno.2 statesthat there is an issueofmaintainabilityofthe petition, whichneeds to be decidedby this Court.

¶64

Notingthe above submissions,list for hearingon 8^ July, 2016.

¶65

MAY 04, 2016

¶66

^AMES^RAO,J

¶67

Dr. Bindu Rana v. Jai Radha Raman Education Society & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Bindu Rana v. Jai Radha Raman Education Society & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tianjin Friend Import & Export Co. Ltd. Vs Cliff Scaffoldings Pvt. Limited

Rajesh Patel & Ors. Vs UOI &Ors.

Nilesh Kumar Diwakar & Ors. Vs State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

N.K. Tyagi Vs R.D Tyagi

Iot Engineering Projects Ltd. Vs Jsc Technopromexport & Anr.

Ge Money Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Starlog Enterprises Ltd.