Senbo Engineering Limited v. Rabindra Nandi
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner was dismissed in default due to lack of appearance and non-prosecution. No substantive order or legal proposition is provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
..... Petitioner
versus
RABINDRA NANDI
..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR O R D E R % 11.02.2016
None has appeared for the petitioner. Matter has been called twice.
None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last date as
well.
Dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2016 ndn
Senbo Engineering Limited
Rabindra Nandi
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court