Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a suit pending in the Patiala House Courts citing a settlement reached with the respondent. The High Court permitted withdrawal based on the terms in the filed application.
Permission to withdraw suit CS(OS) No.3167/2012 granted in terms of settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 269/2016 & C.M. No.10200/2016
M/S ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
| ... | .. Petitioner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Through | Mr.Mani | k Dogra |
and Mr. |
| Dinesh | Sharma, | Ms.Ritika | |
| Shurani, | Advocates | along with | |
| Mr.Inder | jeet Agar | wal, G.M. | |
| Account | and Fina | nce of the | |
| petitione | r. |
versus
M/S BROADCAST SOLUTIONS PTE LTD.
..... Respondent Through Ms.Divya Sharma, Advocate for R-1 and R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 17.03.2016
By way of this petition petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw a suit i.e. the CS(OS) No.3167/2012 titled ‘M/s Zoom Communications Ltd. Vs. M/s Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd.’ pending adjudication before the Court of Additional District Judge, Patiala Hour Courts.
It is stated that the parties have arrived at a settlement and the terms of the settlement are contained in the accompanying application which has been filed under Order XXIII Rule of the CPC (marked as Ex.PX).
The parties having arriving at a settlement the petitioner seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw that suit. That suit was listed before the Additional District Judge for today but the Presiding Officer is on leave. There is an urgency in the matter because the settlement has to be given a final shape as the representatives of the petitioner have to travel to Singapore tonight.
‘CS(OS) No.3167/2012 titled M/s Zoom Communications Ltd. Vs. M/s Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd.’ is permitted to be withdrawn in terms of the aforenoted statement which has been noted supra and the terms as contained in Ex.PX.
Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 17, 2016 ndn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission is required to withdraw a civil suit pending adjudication upon settlement
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
M/S BROADCAST SOLUTIONS PTE LTD.
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
