Petitioner landlord sought withdrawal of eviction petition, claiming the decree had already been passed, and the Court permitted withdrawal.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. S.S. Jain and Mr. Nikesh Jain, Advs.
versus
NIRMALA RANI VOHRA
..... Respondent
Through None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Learned counsel for the petitioner/landlord states that this petition has become infructuous as a decree of eviction has already been passed in his favour. Petition having become infructuous, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. Permission is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 17, 2016 A
SURESH CHAND JAIN
NIRMALA RANI VOHRA
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
