The Single Judge of the Delhi High Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the pending writ petition with liberty to move an appropriate application at an appropriate stage, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw with liberty to move appropriate application at appropriate stage; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 236/2016 M/S VINOD INDUSTRIES PVT LTD
..... Petitioner Through Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma, Ms. Amrit Kumar Oberoi and Ms. Pooja Yadav, Advs.
versus
KUSHAGR ANSAL
..... Respondent Through Nemo.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 10.03.2016
CM(M) 236/2016 & C.M. No.8943/2016, C.M. No.8944/2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty granted to him to move appropriate application at appropriate stage. Permission is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 10, 2016 A
M/S VINOD INDUSTRIES PVT LTD
KUSHAGR ANSAL
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
