Permission granted to withdraw the petition as it had become infructuous due to the suit being settled. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
HARISH GUPTA
Through Mr. Hanu Bhaskar, Advocate
versus
AGGARWAL SABHA ( REGD) & ORS
..... Respondents Through Mr. Ashok Mahajan, Advocate for R-1 to R-3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 11.03.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous as the suit stands settled.
Petition having become infructuous seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. Permission is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 11, 2016 gb
HARISH GUPTA
AGGARWAL SABHA (REGD) & ORS
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
