Dismissed
Icici Bank Ltd. v. Mukesh Sharma
Delhi HCCM(M)/5/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by ICICI Bank against its employee, which was subsequently withdrawn by the bank.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek remedy in the original court.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~8
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CM(M) 5/2016 & CM Nos.200-201/2016
¶4
ICICI BANK LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Punit K.Bhalla, Advocate. versus
¶5
MUKESH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: None.
¶6
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
¶7
O R D E R % 05.01.2016
¶8
- The petitioner Bank has filed the present petition praying for setting aside the orders dated 19.09.2015 and 17.11.2015 passed in Suit No.314/2014.
¶9
- The grievance of the petitioner is that at the time of filing the suit, alongwith the documents second page of the legal notice could not be placed on record and application was filed before the learned Trial Court to supplement the page which inadvertently could not be filed earlier.
¶10
- The grievance of the petitioner is further that the learned Trial Court has insisted for presence of the employee of the petitioner Bank, who issued the notice, for that purpose.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
ICICI BANK LTD
- respondent
MUKESH SHARMA
Coram
AI extract
Pratibha Rani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court