Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the pending petition. The Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
GTM BUILDES & PROMOTERS PVT LTD (THE AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Avneesh Saran and Ms.Anita Saran, Advocates.
versus
SIDDHARTH GUPTA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Alok Kumar and Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 06.01.2016
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
JANUARY 06, 2016
‘st’
GTM BUILDES & PROMOTERS PVT LTD
SIDDHARTH GUPTA & ANR
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
