Mithun v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case involving IPC Sections 395 and 412. During hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested withdrawal of the application, which was acceded to by the Court.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~52
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 82/2016
MITHUN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Nitesh Mehra, Advocate
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with Inspector Davendra Rathi PS Sarai Rohilla
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 14.01.2016
CRL.M.A.627/2016
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
BAIL APPLN. 82/2016
- By way of this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., petitioner is seeking grant of bail in case FIR No.1088/2015 registered at PS Sarai Rohilla under Section 395/412 IPC.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail or dismiss the application as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mithun
- respondent
State
Coram
Pratibha Rani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court