Single judge application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for regular bail dismissed. Court held release would endanger victim and minor son due to apprehension of threats, despite charges not yet framed.
Bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 13.01.2016
SHIV KUMAR ..... Applicant Through Mr. M.K. Duggal, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State ASI Shyam Sunder, P.S. Mukherjee Nagar Mr. Ajay Kumar Pipaniya, Mr. Rohit Arora and Mr. Paras Punyani, Advs. for the complainant along with complainant
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J. (ORAL)
BAIL APPLN. 73/2016
Page 1 of 3
BAIL APPLN. 73/2016
Page 2 of 3
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JANUARY 13, 2016 ` SD
BAIL APPLN. 73/2016
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail ought to be granted when the applicant faces grave charges of grievous hurt and there is an apprehension of threat to the victim.
Whether the circumstances justify the dismissal of a regular bail application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiv Kumar
State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
