This order in a bail application directs the trial court to record evidence of the remaining seven prosecution witnesses without any delay or adjournment within two months of 11.12.2016.
Trial court to record remaining prosecution evidence within two months without adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10.
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashish Deep Verma & Ms.Manasi Agarwal, Advocates.
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP and Ms.Ankita Goyal, Advocate along with SI Manish Kumar, PS-Shalimar Bagh, for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
%
O R D E R 05.12.2016
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall be satisfied in case the remaining prosecution evidence is recorded expeditiously so that he may be able to prefer regular bail thereafter.
From the status report, it appears that out of 21 prosecution witnesses, evidence of 14 prosecution witnesses stands recorded, and only 7 are remaining. The next date of hearing is 11.12.2016 before the Trial Court. The Trial Court is directed that the evidence of the remaining prosecution
witnesses is recorded without any delay and no adjournment shall be sought either by the prosecution or by the accused, and it is hoped that the evidence of remaining prosecution witnesses shall be recorded within the next two months of 11.12.2016.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DECEMBER 05, 2016
B.S. Rohella
HEMANT @ GOLDY
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
