Justice Pratibha Rani dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed in proceedings for cheating. The court found the case unsuitable for bail due to the alleged misrepresentation of title by the petitioner causing significant loss to the complainant.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~76
ABDUL AHAD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.C.M.Sharma, Advocate versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sudershan Joon, APP for the State with SI Manoj Kumar PS Jafrabad
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 09.02.2016
Page 1 of 2
anticipatory bail.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
FEBRUARY 09, 2016 ‘pg’
BAIL APPLN. 140/2016
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner fits the criteria for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.
Whether the trial court's observation regarding lack of title and misrepresentation warrants bail in a cheating case.
Abdul Ahad
State
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
