This order disposed of an arbitration petition by noting the appointment of an arbitrator and the absence of objection to the required disclosure under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
SUPREME ROAD TRANSPORT COMPANY PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Mohit Kumar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Jagjit Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Preet Singh and Mr Sukhdev Singh, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 08.12.2016
By an order dated 07.11.2016, Mr Kuldeep Singh, ADJ (Retired), was appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties and the registry was directed to communicate the said order to elicit a disclosure under section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The Arbitrator has made the necessary disclosure and there is no objection to the same. Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition.
The petition stands disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
DECEMBER 08, 2016 RK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Supreme Road Transport Company Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
