Petitioner sought to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging supernumerary seat provisions in Jamia Millia Islamia's by-laws. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~106
SUHAIB UR REHMAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Faisal, Adv.
versus
JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Zeba Khair, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 10.11.2016
After some submissions learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh one as the relief is confined to admission to B.Tech Course for the year 2016. He states that in the fresh petition, the petitioner intends to challenge the provision of the by-laws which stipulates the admission to 5% supernumerary seats to the wards of the permanent employees, which according to the University are those permanent employees who are in service and not wards of those permanent employees who died in harness.
With the liberty as prayed for, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
NOVEMBER 10, 2016/ jg
Suhaib Ur Rehman
Jamia Millia Islamia
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
