Poonam v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's counsel requested the court to treat the writ petition as a representation to the respondent, requiring a reasoned order within four weeks after an opportunity of hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 9499/2016 & CM Nos.37979-80/2016
POONAM ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pinaki and Sharda Garg, Advocates.
Versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 17.10.2016
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, this writ petition be treated as her representation to the respondent and they be directed to respond to it. Accordingly, the respondents shall treat the writ petition as a representation of the petitioner and dispose it off by way of a reasoned order within four weeks from today after giving due opportunity of hearing to her on 25.10.2016 at 3.00 p.m. The petitioner shall be permitted to be represented through counsel before the respondents for pursuing her representation effectively. The same right shall be available to the respondents as well.
The petition alongwith pending application is disposed off in the above terms.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Poonam
- respondent
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
Coram
Najmi Waziri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court