Petitioner requested withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to pursue available remedies. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and granted liberty.
Liberty granted to pursue remedies as may be available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
RAJINDER PRASAD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Kumar Rathee, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. G. Tushar, Adv. for R- 1 & 2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 07.10.2016
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue his remedies as may be available in law.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
OCTOBER 07, 2016 /kk
Rajinder Prasad
Union of India
Najmi Wazri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
