The High Court of Delhi, while hearing a writ petition, allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue other remedies. The writ petition was subsequently dismissed accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted to pursue remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
BIJENDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.G. Vatsyayana, Adv.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma and Mr. C.K. Bhatt, Advs. for R- 1 & 2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 07.10.2016
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue his remedies as may be available in law.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
OCTOBER 07, 2016 /kk
Bijender Kumar
Government of NCT of Delhi
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
