Dismissed

Dharma Pal Mittal & Ors. v. the Delhi Contonment Board & Oors.

Delhi HC7 Oct 2016W.P.(C)/8371/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition challenging withholding of permission for Dushera Festival dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file suit due to serious disputed questions of fact regarding locus standi and cooperation between parties.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and impleadment applications dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file suit; rights and contentions of parties left open.

Dharma Pal Mittal & Ors. Vs the Delhi Contonment Board & Oors. — Delhi HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~22

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 8371/2016 & C.M.Nos.34658/2016, 37733/2016, 3789337895/2016

¶4

DHARMA PAL MITTAL & ORS. ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through	Mr.Rajeev Nayyar, Sr.Advocate with
	Mr.Mahipal Singh Rajput, Advocate.
versus

¶6

THE DELHI CONTONMENT	BOARD & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through	Mr.Anchit Sharma with Mr.Tarveen
	Singh Nanda and Ms.Satamita Ghosh,
	Advocates for Delhi Cantonment Board.
	Mr.Sanjay Dewan, Advocate for R- 3&4.
	Ms.Priyanka Sharma Goswami with
	Ms.Anusuya Sadhu Sinha and Mr.Saikat
	Sarkar, Advocates for impleader in
	C.M.No.37733/2016.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 07.10.2016

¶10

Present writ petition has been filed challenging the decision of the Cantonment Board dated 15^th September, 2016 temporarily withholding the permission for grant of celebrating Dushera Festival.

¶11

The permission that had been granted to the petitioners i.e. Shree Dushera Samiti specifically stated that the petitioners would use the Dushera ground jointly with Raghunandan Leela Samiti for organizing their programmes. Consequently, the initial permission was based on the premise that both Shree Dushera Samiti and Raghunandan Leela Samiti would organise the programmes jointly, amicably and cordially.

¶12

In the counter-affidavit filed by Delhi Cantonment Board, it has been stated that the petitioner-Samiti failed to work in cooperation with

¶13

Raghunandan Leela Samiti. In fact, it is stated that the petitioners did not even attend the meeting which was called by the respondent-Delhi Cantonment Board on 29^th September, 2016 to resolve the dispute between the parties.

¶14

Today, two impleadment applications have been filed. While CM Appl. No. 37733/2016 has been filed by applicants who claim to be the duly elected management and office bearers of Shree Dushera Samiti stating that the petitioners do not have the locus standi to file the present writ petition as they are not the elected office bearers of the said Samiti; CM Appl. No. 37893/2016 has been filed by Brig. Pradeep Kumar Upmanyu stating that the petitioners have been holding Dushera festivals only to raise funds from the public. He states that the petitioners have not filed any income tax returns till date.

¶15

Keeping in view the aforesaid controversies, this Court is of the view that serious disputed questions of fact arise for consideration in the present proceedings.

¶16

At this stage, Mr.Rajiv Nayyar, learned senior counsel for the petitioners states that he wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a suit.

¶17

With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition and the applications are dismissed as withdrawn. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

¶18

Order dasti under the signatures of Court Master.

¶19

MANMOHAN, J

¶20

OCTOBER 07, 2016 KA

Dharma Pal Mittal & Ors. v. the Delhi Contonment Board & Oors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharma Pal Mittal & Ors. v. the Delhi Contonment Board & Oors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Community Welfare Banquet Association Delhi Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Arvind Kumar Sharma Vs Ircon International Limited

Cbre South Asia Private Limited & Anr. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle -5(2), New Delhi & Ors.

Mystic Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Baldev Raj Vs D.D.A.

Anand Kumar Singh Vs Union F India & Anr.

Anil Bareja Vs Union of India and Anr.

Paramjeet Saini Vs Union of India & Anr.

Kaushal Kumari Relan & Ors. Vs Harish Relan

Shree Agarsain Charitable Society (Regd) Vs Arun Goyal & Ors.

Shree Sanatan Dharam Sabha Samiti Vs Arun Goyal & Ors.

Hakikat Rai Vs D.D.A.

Rajive Chaudhry and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Kavita Kaur Vs P K Gupta & Anr.