The petitioner withdrew the writ petition before this court. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition and application accordingly.
Petition and application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
VIVEK KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Singh, Adv.
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Simran Jeet, Advs. for R1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R
% 06.12.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions from his client to withdraw the petition.
The petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
DECEMBER 06, 2016 /jg
VIVEK KUMAR GUPTA
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
