Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition regarding a tender, with liberty to participate in the fresh tender. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to participate in fresh tender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
M/S PRIMUS SOLUTION ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through : Mr Rajendra Kumar
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Jagjit Singh with Mr Preet Singh
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R
%
07.01.2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from his client, who is also present in Court, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. The withdrawal of this writ petition would be without prejudice to his rights to participate in the fresh tender which has been floated.
Mr Jagjit Singh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Northern Railway, states that the last date of submission of tender and the date of opening of the tender, which was earlier fixed as 07.01.2016, has been extended to 12.01.2016 and the petitioner may participate in the same.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 07, 2016 SR
M/S PRIMUS SOLUTION ENTERPRISES
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
