The High Court of Delhi allowed petitions filed by corporate entities against ambientali events subject to exceptions; specific court file mentions dismissal of clarification applications.
Allowed subject to all just exceptions in the main petitions; clarified that CM 4429/16 and 4427/16 are not necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23 & 24
Through : Mr Atul Gupta with Mr T. D. Satish
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr Vikas Mahajan with Mr S. S. Rai for UOI Mr Rajesh Sharma for intervener/Domestic Industry
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr Vikas Mahajan with Mr S. S. Rai for UOI Mr Rajesh Sharma for intervener/Domestic Industry
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R
% CM 4430/2016 in W.P.(C) 2310/2015 CM 4428/2016 in W.P.(C) 2311/2015
05.02.2016
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CM 4429/2016 in WP(C) 2310/2015 (clarification) CM 4427/2016 in WP(C) 2311/2015 (clarification)
No clarification is necessary. The judgment speaks for itself.
The applications are dismissed.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
FEBRUARY 05, 2016 SR
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
Fairdeal Polychem LLP
Union of India
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
