Single Bench allowed a PIL regarding station security at Delhi Metro, instructing DMRCL to treat petitions as representations and pass an order on feasibility within four weeks.
Direction to Respondent to consider issues as representation and pass order on feasibility of security measures within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35.
MANIK SETHI AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Petitioner No.1 and 2 in person.
Versus
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Roshan Lal Goel, Adv. with Mr.Kavinder Gill, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 08.09.2016 C.M.No.33122/2016 (exemption)
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) No.7994/2016
CHIEF JUSTICE
SEPTEMBER 08, 2016/ ‘anb’ SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
MANIK SETHI AND ORS.
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
