The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition arising from the withdrawal of the impugned administrative order concerning Government services. Finding that the withdrawal rendered the petition moot, no adjudication on merits was conducted.
Petition disposed of as no issue survives given the withdrawal of the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.A.S. Chandhiok, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Avadh Kaushik and Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advs.
versus
GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.P.Roychaudhuri, ASC with Mr.Aamir Aziz, Adv. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 07.09.2016
Sh.P.Roychaudhuri, the learned ASC appearing for the GNCTD has placed before this Court the order dated 29.08.2016 passed by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Services Department withdrawing the order dated 15.06.2016, which is impugned in the present petition.
In view of the said order dated 15.06.2016, it is submitted by the learned counsels for both the parties that nothing survives for adjudication on merits.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
SEPTEMBER 07, 2016 /pmc
Sales Tax Bar Association
GNCT of Delhi
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
