Union sought withdrawal of writ petition regarding Section 33A application status; court dismissed writ and application as withdrawn.
Petition and application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DELHI OFFICE & ESTABLISHMENT EMPLOYEES UNION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K. Viswanath, Advocate. versus IRCTC AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH
O R D E R % 02.02.2016
By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed order dated 01.01.2016 passed by the respondent No.4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before respondent No.3 Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Delhi which is pending.
After some arguments, Mr. K. Viswanath, Advocate seeks permission to withdraw the present petition as well as application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
As prayed, the petition as well as application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V.P.VAISH, J
FEBRUARY 02, 2016/ hs
DELHI OFFICE & ESTABLISHMENT EMPLOYEES UNION
IRCTC AND ORS.
V.P.VAISH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
