This is a one-line order where the High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition seeking reinstatement and salary as a guest teacher as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach appropriate court.
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MEENAKSHI CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Jai Subhash Thakur, Adv.
versus
GNCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Mahua Kalra, Adv. for R-1 & 2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH
O R D E R
% 02.02.2016
By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner inter alia seeking directions to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to reinstate and re-engage the petitioner as a guest teacher. The petitioner also seeks directions to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to pay the salary and other allowances to the petitioner from 01.07.2015.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide letter dated 16.06.2015, the petitioner was relieved as guest teacher in capacity of TGT Home Science w.e.f. 08.05.2015.
After some arguments, Mr.Jai Subhash Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy.
With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V.P.VAISH, J
FEBRUARY 02, 2016/ gm
MEENAKSHI CHAUHAN
GNCT OF DELHI
V.P. VAISH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
