The Court dismissed a Wikipedia petition challenging a CIC order as infructuous. The petition had remained pending for nine years without notice, and the information seeker had no current need for the marks sought.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING (N.I.O.S.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Adv.
Versus
KISHLAY & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R
% 07.01.2016
W.P.(C) 7886/2007
Page 1 of 3
W.P.(C) 7886/2007
Page 2 of 3
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
JANUARY 07, 2016
bs..
Page 3 of 3
W.P.(C) 7886/2007
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a right to information petition pending for nine years without notice served, where the information seeker has moved on and no stay is enforced, should be heard?
THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING (N.I.O.S.)
KISHLAY
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
