Disposed
UOI v. Subhash Chander Agrawal
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/7309/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1 to 3
UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Omanakuttan K.K., Adv. for Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
AND
W.P.(C) 4234/2008 & CM No.8252/2008 (for stay) UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus
SHRI A.N. TIWARI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Omanakuttan K.K., Adv. for Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
AND
SUBHASH CHANDER AGRAWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Omanakuttan K.K., Adv. for Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R % 06.01.2016
W.P.(C) Nos.2908/2007, 4234/2008 & 7309/2009
Page 1 of 2
No costs.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
JANUARY 06, 2016 ‘gsr’..
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) Nos.2908/2007, 4234/2008 & 7309/2009
Union of India
Subhash Chandra Agarwal
Shri A.N. Tiwari
Subhash Chander Agawal
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court