The petitioner withdrew the writ petition as he had joined the respondent's services. The writ petition, accordingly, was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
SANJEEV KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate.
versus
THE INDIAN LAW INSTITUTE THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajat Brar, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 07.12.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already joined the services of the respondent and does not wish to press the present petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
DECEMBER 07, 2016 st
Sanjeev Kumar
The Indian Law Institute Through Its Registrar And Anr.
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
