The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition against an arbitration award withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to seek alternative legal remedies.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take such remedies as may be available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
ST JOHNS SCHOOL ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Anil V. Katarki with Mr. Anil C. Nishani, Advocates.
versus
M/S EDUSMART SERVICES PVT LTD AND ANR .... Respondents Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 06.12.2016
The petitioner impugns an award passed under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to take such remedies as may be available in law.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
DECEMBER 06, 2016 st
ST JOHNS SCHOOL
M/S EDUSMART SERVICES PVT LTD AND ANR
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
