Disposed
Jagtar Singh v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/7777/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
JAGTAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rakesh Tiku, Sr Advocate with Mr Arun Batta, Mr Deepak Aggarwal and Mr Sandeep Kumar
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr Rajan Sabharwal
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R
% 26.02.2016
Mr Sabharwal appearing on behalf of the respondent states, on instructions from
Mr U.C. Bharadwaj, Addl. Dy. Commissioner, R.P. Cell, North Delhi Municipal Corporation, that till the new contract is in place in accordance with law, the petitioner
shall continue on paying the same license fee.
The writ petition stands disposed of in view of the said statement.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 26, 2016 SU
Jagtart Singh
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court