The High Court of Delhi granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw its writ petition and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
THE PEOPLES WELFARE SOCIETY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr K.B. Upadhayay and Mr S.N. Tripathi
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms Mini Pushkarna with Ms Anushruti and Ms Yoothica Pallavi
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 26.02.2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ
petition. The permission is granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 26, 2016 SU
THE PEOPLES WELFARE SOCIETY
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
