This order dismissed the writ petition filed by S. L. Enterprises as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Writ petition and pending application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
S. L. ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain and Mr.Virag Tiwari, Advocates.
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satyakam, Additional Standing Counsel and Mr. S.P. Tiwari, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 05.12.2016
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition.
The writ petition and the pending application are dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
DECEMBER 05, 2016 sb
S. L. ENTERPRISES
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES
S Ravindra Bhat
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
