U.O.I v. Shri A.N. Tiwari
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court disposed of three writ petitions regarding orders of the Chief Information Commissioner. Noting the long delay and pending Supreme Court appeal, the court discharged the applicants with liberty to seek revival later.
What did the court decide?
Petitions disposed with interim orders continued and liberty to apply for revival after the Supreme Court judgment in Civil Appeal No.10044/2010.
What the court decided
$~1 to 3
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2908/2007, CMs No.5453/2007 (for stay) & 7219/2007 (of R-1 for vacation of stay)
UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Omanakuttan K.K., Adv. for Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
AND
- W.P.(C) 4234/2008 & CM No.8252/2008 (for stay) UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus
SHRI A.N. TIWARI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Omanakuttan K.K., Adv. for Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
AND
W.P.(C) 7309/2009 & CM No.3071/2009 (for stay)
UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending writ challenges concerning RTI orders should be disposed of given the long lapse of time and pending Supreme Court appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Union of India
- respondent
Subhash Chandra Agarwal
- respondent
A.N. Tiwari
- respondent
Subhash Chander Agrawal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court