Disposed

Sai Big Star Welfare Association & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Delhi HC18 Oct 2016W.P.(C)/7182/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that the present writ petition, which pertains to entertainment tax, does not fall under the Supreme Court's 1 April 2016 order regarding direct assessment system (DAS). Consequently, the record was directed to be transmitted back to the Bombay High Court.

What did the court decide?

The Registry is directed to transmit the record back to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.

Sai Big Star Welfare Association & Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. — Delhi HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~12

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 7182/2016

¶4

SAI BIG STAR WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Mayank Kshiv Sagar, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh and Mr.Waize Ali Moor, Advocates for TRAI Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for UOI Mr.Yogendr Pal, Consultant for Ministry

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 18.10.2016

¶9

The Supreme Court by order dated 1^st April, 2016 in Transfer Petition (C) No. 430 - 444 of 2016 had observed that having regard to similar legal questions involved in all the writ petitions that are raised before different High Courts and with a view to avoid conflicting decisions by different High Courts, it would be just and proper to withdraw all those cases pending in different High Courts and transfer the same to Delhi High Court.

¶10

The Supreme Court in the said order further held that if any case on the same legal question is filed before the High Court such case shall also be transferred to the Delhi High Court. The Registrar Generals of the respective High Courts were directed to transmit the

¶11

W.P.(C) 7182/2016

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

records of the cases pending before the said High Courts to the Delhi High Court.

¶14

It is contended by counsel for the Union of India that the transfer petition had been filed since there was challenge in various High Courts to the systematic and phased implementation of DAS across the country.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition does not pertain to DAS-III or its implementation but pertains to entertainment tax.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for Union of India on instructions from Mr.Yogender Pal, who is present in Court, also confirms that the present petition does not pertain to implementation of D-III.

¶17

In view of the above, since the present petition is not covered by the order of the Supreme Court dated 1^st April, 2016 in Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 430-444/2016, the Registry is directed to transmit the record back to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.

¶18

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

¶19

OCTOBER 18, 2016 sv

¶20

W.P.(C) 7182/2016

¶21

Page 2 of 2

Sai Big Star Welfare Association & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sai Big Star Welfare Association & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baldev Raj Vs D.D.A.

Anand Kumar Singh Vs Union F India & Anr.

Anil Bareja Vs Union of India and Anr.

Paramjeet Saini Vs Union of India & Anr.

Dynamic Pvt. Iti Vs Director General of Training and Anr.

Bharati Sud & Anr. Vs University of Delhi & Ors.

Ravneet Takhar Vs Commissioner of Income Tax IX and Ors.

Sunny Vs South Delhi M C D through D.C.M.C.D. Green Park and Anr.

Raj Priyanka Chaudhary Vs All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Aiims) through the Director & Anr.

Priyanka Chaudhary & Ors. Vs National Board of Examinations

Ashish Gulati and Ors. Vs the Commissioner of Police and Anr.

Shimla Satellite Cable Private Limited & Anr. Vs the Union of India

Taru Dahiya Vs Union of India and Ors.

Den Manaoranjan Satellite Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr.