The petitioner sought affiliation for its Institute. After filing the writ petition, the respondents granted affiliation. Counsel for the petitioner instructed to withdraw, leading to dismissal.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~68
..... Petitioner
Through : Mr Ajay Vikram Singh, Ms Priyanka Singh and Mr Pritam Bishwas, Advocates.
versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF TRAINING AND ANR..... Respondents Through : Ms Meera Bhatia, Advocate for Union of India. Ms Meghna Rohatgi and Mr Vikas Chopra, Advocates for QCI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 19.10.2016 W.P.(C) 9547/2016 & CM No.38240/2016(direction)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the filing of the petition, the respondents have granted affiliation to the petitioner – Institute and he has instructions to withdraw the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
OCTOBER 19, 2016 ‘sn’
Dynamic Pvt I.T.I.
Director General of Training
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
