This order dismisses a writ petition for non-prosecution as petitioners failed to file requisite documents despite a preemptive warning, allowing them to file a fresh petition with relevant documentation.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; leave granted to file a fresh petition with relevant documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
Through None
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Shobhana Takiar with Mr. Udayan Khandelwal, Advocate for DDA. Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD. Ms. Reema Khorana, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 01.12.2016
None for the petitioners. None was present for the petitioners on the last date of hearing and an adjournment slip was circulated. On 15.09.2016, a preemptive order was passed that in case documents are not filed within one week, the petition would be dismissed for non-prosecution. Documents have still not been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this petition and all applications with leave to the petitioners to file a fresh petition along with relevant documents, if maintainable.
G.S.SISTANI, J
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
DECEMBER 01, 2016 pst /
Ramesh & Ors.
Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
G.S. Sistani
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
