High Court of Delhi dismissed a review application rejecting a petition for review of an order dated 9.2.2016, citing lack of grounds, and also dismissed the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the review petition.
The review application and the application for condonation of delay were treated as dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 23.03.2016
RP No.144/2016 & CM No.10925/2016
This is a petition for review of the order dated 9.2.2016, accompanied by an application seeking condonation of delay of 5 days in filing the review application.
We have gone through the review petition/application, but do not find any ground to review the order dated 9.2.2016.
In these circumstances, we are not inclined to issue notice on the application seeking condonation of delay. Consequently, the application seeking condonation of delay and the review application will be treated as dismissed.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
MARCH 23, 2016/tp
L.D. MADAN
UNION OF INDIA
SANJIV KHANNA
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
