The High Court of Delhi dismissed two withdrawn writ petitions challenging the Adarsh Cooperative Society. The order recorded no substantive pronouncement or legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10 and 11
BABLI AND ANOTHER ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr C.M. Thapliyal and Mr S. Paul, Advs.
versus
ADARSH COOPERATIVE URBAN TH RIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Harjinder Singh, Adv for R-1
And
Through: Mr C.M. Thapliyal and Mr S. Paul, Advs.
versus
ADARSH COOPERATIVE URBAN THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Harjinder Singh, Adv for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 10.02.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner says that he has instructions to withdraw these writ petitions.
W.P.(C) 7060/2013 and W.P.(C) No.7061/2013 are dismissed
as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2016 bg
Babli
Adarsh Cooperative Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd.
S. Ravindra Bhat
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
