Pending an assurance from the respondent society to enroll petitioners as members within 7 days and grant voting rights in upcoming elections, the court disposed of the writ petition without further discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~03
PARTHA PARTIM BANERJEE & ORS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate.
versus
..... Respondent Through Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate for R-1 and 2.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Mr. Shivam Tripathi, Advocate for the Cooperative Society.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA
O R D E R % 06.10.2016
Learned counsel, who appears for Shivlok Cooperative Group
Housing Society, states that the petitioners would be enrolled as members within 7 days and they would be entitled to vote in the forthcoming elections.
In view of the statement made by the counsel appearing for
Shivlok Cooperative Group Housing Society, the writ petition is disposed of.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
SUNITA GUPTA, J.
OCTOBER 06, 2016/ NA
Partha Partim Banerjee & Ors
Shivlok Cooperative Group Housing Society
Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors
Sanjiv Khanna
Sunita Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
