An interlocutory order in a writ petition where the Court directed neither party, adjourned for future hearing with an instruction to renotify by May 1, 2017, effectively stating no time was left for further proceedings on the current date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
INDIAN NATIONAL TRUST FOR ART AND CULTURAL HERITAGE (INTACH) DELHI CHAPTER THROUGH ITS CONVENOR MR. A.G. KRISHNA MENON
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ishwar Mohanty, Advocate.
versus
HERITAGE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE & ORS.
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar for DDA. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG with Mr. Saket Sikri and Mr. Archit Upadhyay for D-7. Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Vidur Mohan and Ms. Rhea Verma, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Anil Grover with Ms. Kanika Singh for NDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 20.04.2017
No time left.
Renotify on 1st May, 2017.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
APRIL 20, 2017 sk
Indian National Trust For Art And Cultural Heritage (INTACH) Delhi Chapter
Heritage Conservation Committee
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
