This order quashed a writ petition where the petitioner had sought a transfer stay for his wife's medical treatment. The High Court noted that the transfer order was already deferred on compassionate grounds per an earlier order, rendering the current petition infructuous.
Writ petition declared infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
Through Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Prasanta Varma, Sr. Standing counsel for respondents no.1 to 3
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 05.12.2016
In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought extension of his posting at the 25th Batallion by a period of one year on the ground of medical treatment of his wife who is undergoing IVF treatment. In view of the submission made on 23rd August, 2016 that the petitioner’s wife was not in a position to travel for a period of 7 months this Court directed the respondents to seek instructions as to whether some time could be granted to the petitioner. It appears that pursuant to the directions to obtain instructions, an order dated 9.9.2016 has been passed whereby the transfer order of the petitioner
has been deferred till 31st March, 2017 on compassionate ground for medical treatment of his wife.
The photocopy of the order dated 9.9.2016 be tagged to the
records.
The writ petition has thus become infructuous and the same is
disposed of.
INDIRA BANERJEE, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
DECEMBER 05, 2016 mw
Bhudev Singh
Union of India
Indira Banerjee
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
