Disposed
Rajiva Ranjan v. Dena Bank
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/6685/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
CM Application disposed as not pressed following disposal of the main appeal by the appellate authority.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~15
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 6685/2016
¶4
RAJIVA RANJAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Advocate. versus
¶5
DENA BANK ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate.
¶6
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
¶7
O R D E R % 21.02.2017
¶8
C.M. Appl. No. 6436/2017 in W.P.(C) 6685/2016
¶9
This application is disposed of as not pressed as counsel for the respondent/applicant states that the appeal filed by the petitioner before the appellate authority has been disposed of.
¶10
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
¶11
FEBRUARY 21, 2017
¶12
AK
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
RAJIVA RANJAN
- respondent
DENA BANK
Coram
AI extract
VALMIKI J. MEHTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court