Petitioner appearing in person withdrew the writ petition challenging selection. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
..... Petitioner
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Aditya Dewan & Mr. Arpit Shukla, GP for R-1 & 2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 02.08.2016
The petitioner, who appears in person wishes to withdraw the writ
petition to challenge to selection now made in a fresh proceedings. The
petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
AUGUST 02, 2016/ ak
DR. RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
