The High Court recalled a 27.07.2016 order due to new facts brought to notice. The petitioner sought recall of that order for school admission cancellation. Petitioner withdrew the writ petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
Order dated 27.07.2016 was recalled; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
MISS RHYTHM (MINOR) THROUGH HER FATHER NAVEEN KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate.
versus
LANCERS CONVENT SCHOOL AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. S.N. Gupta with Ms. Nishtha Garg, Advocates for respondent No.1. Ms. Meenakshi Midha, ASC for respondent No.2 and Ms. Ensha Chhabra, Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Mathur, A- Zone, DOE.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 22.09.2016
CM No.31122/2016
By this application, the respondent School seeks recall of order/judgment dated 27.07.2016. It is contended that there were certain facts which were not brought to the notice of this Court when the order/judgment dated 27.07.2016 was passed.
Learned counsel for the respondent School submits that judgment dated 27.07.2016 itself records that in case the income certificate furnished by the petitioner was not found to be correct, it was open to the respondent school to cancel the admission. It is contended that certain information was received, as stated in the
WP(C) 6243/2016
Page 1
application, based on which the admission of the petitioner has been cancelled.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not wish to file a response to the application. He submits that the order/judgment dated 27.07.2017 may be recalled.
In view of the above, the order/judgment dated 27.07.2017 is recalled. The writ petition is restored to its original number. W.P.(C) 6243/2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 st
WP(C) 6243/2016
Page 2
MISS RHYTHM (MINOR) THROUGH HER FATHER NAVEEN KUMAR
LANCERS CONVENT SCHOOL AND ANR
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
