The Court ordered a renotation of the proceedings for 02.09.2016 at the request of the respondent's counsel to facilitate appropriate steps following which the Collector and Competent Authority were un-impleaded.
The matter was re-noted for adjournment to 02.09.2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25 of 08.07.2016
KISHAN LAL ..... Petitioner
Through Mr Tarun Arora, Advocate.
versus
DELHI FINANCIAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Mr Rajan Tyagi, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 11.07.2016
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the impugned notice has been issued by the Office of the Collector consequent to the adjudication under Section 32(G) by the Competent Authority of the Delhi Government. He submits that neither the Collector nor Competent Authority has been impleaded in the present proceedings. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks for an adjournment to take appropriate steps.
At request, renotify on 02.09.2016.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JULY 11, 2016 st
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for adjournment to implead the Collector and Competent Authority warranted the instant adjournment being granted.
Kishan Lal
Delhi Financial Corporation
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
