Disposed
Meenakshi Jha v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/5717/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS
..... Respondents Through Mr.Deepak for Mr.Rajan Tyagi, Adv. for MCD with Mr. Brij Kishore, A.E. Mr.Siddhartha Shanker Ray, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Ajit Nair and Ms.Shruti Kukreja, Advocate for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 19.09.2016
Learned counsel for respondent no.1 submits that partial demolition after the last order has taken place. This is also admitted by private respondent (respondent no.3). Counsel for respondent no.1 submits that further demolition programme is fixed for 26.9.2016. All actions in accordance with law will be carried out by respondent no.1 with the assistance of respondent no.2. Demolition action will be taken to its ultimate goal in true letter and spirit.
Petition disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2016/ndn
MEENAKSHI JHA
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
RAJAN TYAGI
Unknown R-3
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court